Every topos has its own internal language, the so called Mitchell-Bénabou language, allowing us to speak about formulas and their truth values.
Sadly, Jean Bénabou died last week.
Here’s a nice interview with Bénabou (in French) on category theory, Grothendieck, logic, and a rant on plagiarism among topos theorists (starting at 1:00:16).
Yesterday, France Culture’s ‘La methode scientifique’ hosted Alain Connes, Laurent Lafforgue and Olivia Caramello in a special programme Grothendieck: la moisson (Grothendieck, the harvest), dedicated to the recent publication of ‘Récoltes et Semailles’.
An interesting item is ‘le reportage du jour’ by Céline Loozen in which she manages to have a look at the 60.000 pages of Grothendieck’s Lasserre notes, stocked in the cellars of the Librairie Alain Brieux, and talks to Jean-Bernard Gillot who is commissioned by Grothendieck’s son to appraise the work (starts at 36:40).
Perhaps the publication of ‘Récoltes et Semailles’ is part of a deal with the family to make these notes available, at last.
Towards the end of the programme Connes, Caramello and Lafforgue lament that topos theory is still not taken seriously by the mathematical community at large, whereas it is welcomed warmly by the engineers of Huawei.
In more topos news, I learn from the blog of Olivia Caramello, that Laurent Lafforgue is going to give an online course on toposes as ‘bridges’ at the University of Warwick, the first talk starts today at 14hrs London time.
- On categories, go and the book $\in$
- the topos of unconsciousness
- how much to spend on (cat)books?
- Toposes alive and kicking at IHES
- le lemme de la Gare du Nord
- Where’s Bourbaki’s tomb?
- thanks for linking
- 5 unfortunate French logicians
- Two lecture series on absolute geometry
- Grothendieck’s gribouillis (4)