On page 227 of Symmetry and the Monster, Mark Ronan tells the story of Conway and Norton computing the number of independent mini j-functions (McKay-Thompson series) arising from the Moonshine module. There are 194 distinct characters of the monster (btw. see the background picture for the first page of the character table as given in the Atlas), but some of them give the same series reducing the number of series to 171. But, these are not all linearly independent. Mark Ronan writes :
“Conway recalls that, ‘As we went down into the 160s, I said let’s guess what number we will reach.’ They guessed it would be 163 - which has a very special property in number theory - and it was!
There is no explanation for this. We don’t know whether it is merely a coincidence, or something more. The special property of 163 in number theory has intruiging consequences, among which is the fact that
is very close to being a whole number.”
The corresponding footnote is a bit cryptic and doesn’t explain this near miss integer.
“This special feature also yields a fact, first noticed by Euler, that the formula
gives prime numbers for all values of x between 1 and 40. The connection with 163 is that the solution to
involves the square root of -163.”
So, what is really going on?
The modular j-function has a power series expansion in
starting off as

and classifies complex elliptic curves upto isomorphism, or equivalently, two-dimensional integral lattices upto a complex scaling factor. A source of two-dimensional integral lattices is given by the rings of integers
in quadratic imaginary extensions of the rational numbers
. So, perhaps one might expect special properties of the j-value
whenever this ring of integers has special properties.
Leopold Kronecker discovered in 1857 the remarkable fact that the modular j-function detects the class number of
. Recall that the class-number is a finite number measuring the amount by which the ring on integers
in
fails to be a unique factorization domain. He proved :
The function-value
is an algebraic integer whose degree is the class number of the quadratic extension. In particular, if the ring of integers in
satisfied unique factorization (or equivalently, is a principal ideal domain), then
is an integer!
Special instances of this theorem were already known. For example, the Gaussian integers
satisfy unique factorization and Gauss knew already that
. He even knew that

and because
is the ring of integers in
and as the absolute value of this j-value is near the value of
we must be closing in on the solution of the riddle.
Charles Hermite noticed in 1859 this curious numerical consequence of Kronecker’s theorem. For, if one takes
and plugs this into the definition of
one gets the tiny number
which is equal to -0.0000000000000000038089809370076523382…
So, all but the first two terms in the series expansion of
will be very small. For example
and the next term
is already 0.00000000000000000000000000031183868… and further terms will be even a lot smaller.
Combining this information with the Gauss-computed value of
we get that

whence the observed curious approaximation of

What about other near misses which follow from Kronecker’s result? Unfortunately there are only nine imaginary quadratic extension
for which the corresponding ring of integers satisfies unique factorization, namely

and of course the near misses will be worse for smaller values of D. For example for the next two largest values one calculates


Reference :
John Stillwell, Modular Miracles, The American Mathematical Monthly, 108 (2001) 70-76
Conway, google, groups, modular, monster, moonshine, symmetry
8 comments
Posted in modular
Written on Thu, 14 June 2007 at 1:22 pm
Tags: Conway, google, groups, modular, monster, moonshine, symmetry
If you liked this post, then consider subscribing to our full RSS feed.

June 16th, 2007 at 12:07 am
Beautiful! Thanks for creating such a wondeful new blog.
June 16th, 2007 at 1:55 pm
What a wonderful surprise! Congratulations on your beautiful and carefullly done new blog!
Christine
June 16th, 2007 at 6:51 pm
1 - Could this near miss be due to 43, 67, 163 not being supersingular primes?
2 - Thanks for the pdf registry. I thought I had a computer dump of your blog, but it was only a print dump of 20 pages inclusive from ‘bloomsday-end’ to the fifth part of your NCG geometry course ‘the NC manifold of a Riemann surface’ without any diagrams or figures.
June 16th, 2007 at 8:49 pm
Kea & Christine : thanks! Though I love to restyle my blog from time to time it’s a time consuming exercise so it is always nice if al least some people like the result. Doug : as to 1. no, there are infinitely non-supersingular primes and just 9 p’s such that the ring of integers in
is a principal ideal domain (which is the reason for the near miss). as to 2. the pdf-files are not perfect but will have to do for now. probably i will recycle/update some old posts when they are on-topic here (such as the Mathieu post and some on modular groups).
To all of you I apologize for having set my options so that anyone can post a comment provided they have one comment approved. So, only your first comment will not appear automatic. I learned the hard way it saves me time removing spam-comments.
June 18th, 2007 at 4:29 pm
The mathematical near miss is conceptually reminiscent of the 1999 Physics Nobel Award, from the Presentation Speech: “… ‘t Hooft and Veltman tell us instead: calculate as if the number of dimensions were slightly less than four, four minus epsilon, i.e., 3.99999. This approach proved to be highly effective. The nasty infinities became less frightening. They could be collected, harnessed and interpreted …” http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1999/presentation-speech.html
Notice these curiosities:
3 + 1 = 4 = 2^2
43 + 1 = 44 = (2^2) * 11
67 + 1 = 68 = (2^2) * 17
163 + 1 = 164 = (2^2) * 41
These are similar to but different from:
196884 - 1 = 196883 = 47 * 59 * 71
Yet it appears as though all of these numbers can be related to some form of supersingular primes. I do not know if this is significant or merely happenstance.
June 20th, 2007 at 12:23 pm
Hi! Been away for a while, so I didn’t see the redesign till today. Love the new design! Just a small accesibility issue: in ffox 2.x for linux (cannot say for windows) compulsory fields in any form appear with light yellow background. So for the name, email and website (don’t know exactly why also this one) I am forced to reading white text over light yellow background, which is not a very pleasant experience.
More on-topic: Very nice property of 163! I must have a really twisted mind, though, since first thing I thought about it was “Ohhh, I could use it for the arbitrary-precision computing practice for my CS students, and tell them that it is a whole number unless they are introducting carrying mistakes” and then thinking of the feeling of walking around the clasroom, smiling for myself, while they desperately try to find errors in their codes… Maybe I’ll do it, at least it will show them not to believe something true just because the teacher told it
June 22nd, 2007 at 6:01 am
A108764 Products of exactly two supersingular primes (A002267).
4, 6, 9, 10, 14, 15, 21, 22, 25, 26, 33, 34, 35, 38, 39, 46, 49, 51, 55, 57, 58, 62, 65, 69, 77, 82, 85, 87, 91, 93, 94, 95, 115, 118, 119, 121, 123, 133, 141, 142, 143, 145, 155, 161, 169, 177, 187, 203, 205, 209, 213, 217, 221, 235, 247, 253, 287, 289, 295, 299
There are exactly 15 supersingular primes: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 41, 47, 59, and 71 (A002267). The supersingular primes are exactly the set of primes that divide the group order of the Monster group….
June 24th, 2007 at 6:03 am
I remember martin gardner wrote an april fool’s joke in 1975 that announced a proof that e^{\pi \sqrt{163}} is an integer!