<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dedekind tessellation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/the-dedekind-tessellation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/the-dedekind-tessellation.html</link>
	<description>lieven le bruyn&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:50:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dedekind or Klein ? &#124; neverendingbooks</title>
		<link>http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/the-dedekind-tessellation.html/comment-page-1#comment-9460</link>
		<dc:creator>Dedekind or Klein ? &#124; neverendingbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neverendingbooks.org/?p=18#comment-9460</guid>
		<description>[...] left of a tessellation of the hyperbolic upper-halfplane, was called the Dedekind tessellation in this post, following the reference given by John Stillwell in his excellent paper Modular Miracles, The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] left of a tessellation of the hyperbolic upper-halfplane, was called the Dedekind tessellation in this post, following the reference given by John Stillwell in his excellent paper Modular Miracles, The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quivers versus quilts &#124; neverendingbooks</title>
		<link>http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/the-dedekind-tessellation.html/comment-page-1#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>quivers versus quilts &#124; neverendingbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neverendingbooks.org/?p=18#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the three red dots (all of them even points in the Dedekind tessellation) give (after the identification) the two points indicated by a  whereas the blue dot (an odd point [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the three red dots (all of them even points in the Dedekind tessellation) give (after the identification) the two points indicated by a  whereas the blue dot (an odd point [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiver-superpotentials &#124; neverendingbooks</title>
		<link>http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/the-dedekind-tessellation.html/comment-page-1#comment-4262</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiver-superpotentials &#124; neverendingbooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neverendingbooks.org/?p=18#comment-4262</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] in the Dedeking tessellation. (For more on these terms and constructions, please consult the series Modular subgroups and Dessins [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the Dedeking tessellation. (For more on these terms and constructions, please consult the series Modular subgroups and Dessins [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lieven</title>
		<link>http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/the-dedekind-tessellation.html/comment-page-1#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>lieven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neverendingbooks.org/?p=18#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Doug,
the top picture is taken from John Stillwell so I cannot comment on his reasons but as for the other picture, there are only so many marks you can include and I had no intention to include full Fareys...
Yes there is a nice connection with the devils staircase and its on my list of &#039;to do posts&#039;. In short, the devil translates ONAG-numbers to Fareys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,<br />
the top picture is taken from John Stillwell so I cannot comment on his reasons but as for the other picture, there are only so many marks you can include and I had no intention to include full Fareys&#8230;<br />
Yes there is a nice connection with the devils staircase and its on my list of &#8216;to do posts&#8217;. In short, the devil translates ONAG-numbers to Fareys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/the-dedekind-tessellation.html/comment-page-1#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neverendingbooks.org/?p=18#comment-389</guid>
		<description>1 - The Farey sequence in the top diagram of this thread appears to use &#039;2/7, 3/7, 4/7, 5/7&#039; but not &#039;1/7 or 6/7&#039;.
This seems to be an incomplete order F7 sequence.
Why?
Likewise the bottom diagram appears to be similarly incomplete but with &#039;1/6 and 5/6&#039; absent as well.
Is this just a labelling convenience?

2 - Farey sequences of 3,6,9 order [F3,F6,F9] appear to contain Cantor sets?
Is there a relation to the &#039;devil&#039;s staircase&#039; through the Cantor Function?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 &#8211; The Farey sequence in the top diagram of this thread appears to use &#8217;2/7, 3/7, 4/7, 5/7&#8242; but not &#8217;1/7 or 6/7&#8242;.<br />
This seems to be an incomplete order F7 sequence.<br />
Why?<br />
Likewise the bottom diagram appears to be similarly incomplete but with &#8217;1/6 and 5/6&#8242; absent as well.<br />
Is this just a labelling convenience?</p>
<p>2 &#8211; Farey sequences of 3,6,9 order [F3,F6,F9] appear to contain Cantor sets?<br />
Is there a relation to the &#8216;devil&#8217;s staircase&#8217; through the Cantor Function?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/the-dedekind-tessellation.html/comment-page-1#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neverendingbooks.org/?p=18#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this.  I noticed a couple typos:

\rho should be e^{(\pi/3)*i}

odd edges connect cusps to odd vertices.

-C</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this.  I noticed a couple typos:</p>
<p>\rho should be e^{(\pi/3)*i}</p>
<p>odd edges connect cusps to odd vertices.</p>
<p>-C</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

