non-commutative geometry
- Brauer’s forgotten group
- connected component coalgebra
- Galois and the Brauer group
- a noncommutative Grothendieck topology
- noncommutative geometry
- noncommutative geometry 2
- projects in noncommutative geometry
- points and lines
- more noncommutative manifolds
- the necklace Lie bialgebra
- the one quiver for GL(2,Z)
- representation spaces
- quiver representations
- moduli spaces
- cotangent bundles
- differential forms
- curvatures
- Brauer-Severi varieties
- smooth Brauer-Severis
- hyper-resolutions
- a cosmic Galois group
- double Poisson algebras
- A for aggregates
- B for bricks
- necklaces (again)
- seen this quiver?
- why nag? (2)
- why nag? (3)
- sexing up curves
- the Klein stack
- Alain Connes on everything
- noncommutative topology (1)
- a noncommutative topology 2
- noncommutative topology (3)
- noncommutative topology (4)
- non-geometry
- non-(commutative) geometry
- noncommutative Fourier transform
- noncommutative bookmarks
- noncommutative geometry : a medieval science?
After yesterday’s post I had to explain today what
point-modules and line-modules are and that one can really
describe them as points in a (commutative) variety. Seemingly, the
present focus on categorical methods scares possibly interested students
away and none of them seems to know that this non-commutative projective
algebraic geometry once dealt with very concrete examples.
Let
us fix the setting : A will be a quadratic algebra, that is, A is
a positively graded algebra, part of degree zero the basefield k,
generated by its homogeneous part A1 of degree one (which we take to be
of k-dimension n 1) and with all defining relations quadratic in these
generators. Take m k-independent linear terms (that is, elements of A1)
: l1,…,lm and consider the graded left A-module
L = A/(Al1 + ... + Alm)
Clearly, the Hilbert series of this module (that is, the formal power series in t with coefficient of t^a the k-dimension of the homogeneous part of L of degree a) starts off with
Hilb(L,t) = 1 + (n+1-m) t + ...
and we call L a linear d-dimensional module if the Hilbert series is the power series expansion of
1/(1-t)^{d +1} = 1 + (d+1)t +(d
+1)(d +2)/2 t^2 ... In particular, if d=0 (that is, m=n) then L
is said to be a point-module and if d=1 (that is, m=n-1) then L
is said to be a line-module. To a d-dimensional linear module L
one can associate a d-dimensional linear subspace of ordinary (that is,
commutative) projective n-space P^n. To do this, identifyP^n = P(A 1^*)the projective space of the n 1 dimensional space of linear functions on the homogeneous part of degree one. Then each of the linear elements li determines a hyperplane V(li) in P^n and the intersection of the m hyperplanes V(l1),…,V(lm) is the wanted subspace. In particular, to a point-module corresponds a point in P^n and to a line-module a line in P^n. So, where is the non-commutativity of A hidden? Well, if P is a point-module
P = P0 + P1 + P2 +...(with all components P_a one dimensional) then the twisted module
P' = P1 + P2 + P3 + ...is again a point-module and the map P–>P’ defines an automorphism on the point variety. In low dimensions, it is often possible to reconstruct A from the point-variety and automorphism. In higher dimensions, one has to consider also the higher dimensional linear modules.
When I explained all this (far clumsier as it was a long time since I worked with this) I was asked for an elementary text on all this. ‘Why hasn’t anybody written a book on all this?’ Well, Paul Smith wrote such a book so have a look at his homepage. But then, it turned out that the version one can download from one of his course pages is a more recent and a lot more categorical version. There is no more sight of a useful book on non-commutative projective spaces and their linear modules which might give starting students an interesting way to learn some non-commutative algebra and the beginnings of algebraic geometry (commutative and non-commutative). So, hopefully Paul still has the old version around and will make it available… The only webpage on this I could find in short time are the slides of a talk by Michaela Vancliff.
Artin, geometry, non-commutative, teaching
No comments
Posted in geometry
Written on Sun, 06 June 2004 at 11:29 am
Tags: Artin, geometry, non-commutative, teaching
If you liked this post, then consider subscribing to our full RSS feed.
Leave a Reply