non-commutative geometry
- Brauer’s forgotten group
- connected component coalgebra
- Galois and the Brauer group
- a noncommutative Grothendieck topology
- noncommutative geometry
- noncommutative geometry 2
- projects in noncommutative geometry
- points and lines
- more noncommutative manifolds
- the necklace Lie bialgebra
- the one quiver for GL(2,Z)
- representation spaces
- quiver representations
- moduli spaces
- cotangent bundles
- differential forms
- curvatures
- Brauer-Severi varieties
- smooth Brauer-Severis
- hyper-resolutions
- a cosmic Galois group
- double Poisson algebras
- A for aggregates
- B for bricks
- necklaces (again)
- seen this quiver?
- why nag? (2)
- why nag? (3)
- sexing up curves
- the Klein stack
- Alain Connes on everything
- noncommutative topology (1)
- a noncommutative topology 2
- noncommutative topology (3)
- noncommutative topology (4)
- non-geometry
- non-(commutative) geometry
- noncommutative Fourier transform
- noncommutative bookmarks
- noncommutative geometry : a medieval science?
Again I
spend the whole morning preparing my talks for tomorrow in the master
class. Here is an outline of what I will cover :
- examples of
noncommutative points and curves. Grothendieck’s characterization of
commutative regular algebras by the lifting property and a proof that
this lifting property in the category alg of all l-algebras is
equivalent to being a noncommutative curve (using the construction of a
generic square-zero extension).
- definition of the affine
scheme rep(n,A) of all n-dimensional representations (as always,
l is still arbitrary) and a proof that these schemes are smooth
using the universal property of k(rep(n,A)) (via generic
matrices).
- whereas rep(n,A) is smooth it is in general
a disjoint union of its irreducible components and one can use the
sum-map to define a semigroup structure on these components when
l is algebraically closed. I’ll give some examples of this
semigroup and outline how the construction can be extended over
arbitrary basefields (via a cocommutative coalgebra).
-
definition of the Euler-form on rep A, all finite dimensional
representations. Outline of the main steps involved in showing that the
Euler-form defines a bilinear form on the connected component semigroup
when l is algebraically closed (using Jordan-Holder sequences and
upper-semicontinuity results).
After tomorrow’s
lectures I hope you are prepared for the mini-course by
Markus Reineke on non-commutative Hilbert schemes
next week.
geometry, Grothendieck, non-commutative, noncommutative, representations
No comments
Posted in geometry
Written on Tue, 09 March 2004 at 9:21 pm
Tags: geometry, Grothendieck, non-commutative, noncommutative, representations
If you liked this post, then consider subscribing to our full RSS feed.
Leave a Reply