Comments on: Lambda-rings for formula-phobics http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/lambda-rings-for-formula-phobics.html lieven le bruyn's blog Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:50:41 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: nobody http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/lambda-rings-for-formula-phobics.html/comment-page-1#comment-15826 nobody Sat, 28 May 2011 01:26:12 +0000 http://www.neverendingbooks.org/?p=2853#comment-15826 it is correct that $\gamma$ has range $A[[t]]$ not $\Lambda (A)$? lievenlb : thx! have corrected that one. it is correct that $\gamma$ has range $A[[t]]$ not $\Lambda (A)$?

lievenlb : thx! have corrected that one.

]]> By: Qiaochu Yuan http://www.neverendingbooks.org/index.php/lambda-rings-for-formula-phobics.html/comment-page-1#comment-8595 Qiaochu Yuan Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:52:27 +0000 http://www.neverendingbooks.org/?p=2853#comment-8595 <p>Interesting. My understanding was that lambda-rings are a decategorification of the category of representations of a nice group equipped with the exterior power functors. More generally I guess one can consider the exterior power on vector bundles over a space. What's the relationship between this perspective and the one you give?</p> Interesting. My understanding was that lambda-rings are a decategorification of the category of representations of a nice group equipped with the exterior power functors. More generally I guess one can consider the exterior power on vector bundles over a space. What’s the relationship between this perspective and the one you give?

]]>