on July 12, 2007 by lieven in groups, modular, Comments (1)
Generators of modular subgroups
Modular subgroups
- The Dedekind tessellation
- Modular quilts and cuboid tree diagrams
- Hyperbolic Mathieu polygons
- Farey codes
- Generators of modular subgroups
In older NeverEndingBooks-posts (and here) proofs were given that the modular group
is the group free product
, so let’s just skim over details here. First one observes that
is generated by (the images of) the invertible 2×2 matrices
and 
A way to see this is to consider X=U.V and Y=V.U and notice that multiplying with powers of X adds multiples of the second row to the first (multiply on the left) or multiples of the first column to the second (multiply on the right) and the other cases are handled by taking multiples with powers of Y. Use this together with the fact that matrices in
have their rows and columns made of coprime numbers to get any such matrix by multiplication on the left or right by powers of X and Y into the form
and because 
we see that
is an epimorphic image of
. To prove isomorphism one can use the elegant argument due to Roger Alperin considering the action of the Moebius transformations
and
(with
) induced by the generators U and V on the sets
and
of all positive (resp. negative) irrational real numbers. Observe that
and 
Hence, if
is a word in
and
of off length we either have
or
so
can never be the identity. If the length is even we can conjugate
such that it starts with
. If it starts with
then
is a subset of positive rationals less than 1 whereas if it starts with
then
is a subset of positive rationals greater than 1, so again it cannot be the identity. Done!
By a result of Aleksandr Kurosh it follows that every modular subgroup is the group free product op copies of
or
and we would like to determine the free generators explicitly for a cofinite subgroup starting from its associated Farey code associated to a special polygon corresponding to the subgroup.
To every even interval
in the Farey code one associates the generator of a
component

to every odd interval
in the Farey code we associate the generator of a
component

and finally, to every pair of free intervals
we associate the generator of a
component

Kulkarni’s result states that these matrices are free generators of the cofiniite modular subgroup determined by the Farey code. For example, for the M(12) special polygon on the left (bounded by the thick black geodesics), the Farey-code for this Mathieu polygon is
![\xymatrix{\infty \ar@{-}[r]_{1} & 0 \ar@{-}[r]_{\bullet} & \frac{1}{3} \ar@{-}[r]_{\bullet} & \frac{1}{2} \ar@{-}[r]_{\bullet} & 1 \ar@{-}[r]_{1} & \infty} \xymatrix{\infty \ar@{-}[r]_{1} & 0 \ar@{-}[r]_{\bullet} & \frac{1}{3} \ar@{-}[r]_{\bullet} & \frac{1}{2} \ar@{-}[r]_{\bullet} & 1 \ar@{-}[r]_{1} & \infty}](/latexrender/pictures/6af1ed91fa882ca98e87c144bd54fd81.gif)
Therefore, the structure of the subgroup must be
with the generator of the infinite factor being
and those of the cyclic factors of order three
and 
This approach also gives another proof of the fact that
because the Farey code to the subgroup of index 1 is
corresponding to the fundamental domain on the left. This finishes (for now) this thread on Kulkarni’s paper (or rather, part of it). On the Lost? page I will try to list threads in a logical ordering when they materialize.
Reference
Ravi S. Kulkarni, “An arithmetic-geometric method in the study of the subgroups of the modular group”, Amer. J. Math 113 (1991) 1053-1133








Suresh Govindarajan
August 18, 2008 @ 5:05 am
I was trying to reproduce the generators for M(12) that you have written out. Using the Kulkarni formula, I obtain the generator of the infinite factor that differs from the one you wrote. I get the matrix with row1=(-1, 1) and row2=(0 1) — this has det=-1(?). I also get -8 in the place of 8 in the second order-three generator which makes its det=+1. Are these typos?