The game of
Fox and Geese is usually played on a cross-like
board. I learned about it from the second volume of the first edition of
Winning Ways
for your Mathematical Plays which is now reprinted as number 3 of
the series. In the first edition,
Elwyn Berlekamp,
John Conway and
Richard Guy claimed that the value of their
starting position (they play it on an 8×8 chess board with the Geese on
places a1,c1,e1 and g1 and the Fox at place e8) has exact value
1 + 1/onwhere on is the class of all ordinal numbers so 1/on is by far the smallest infinitesimal number you can think of. In this second edition which I bought a week ago, they write about this :
We remained steadfast in that belief until we heard objections from John Tromp. We then also received correspondence from Jonathan Weldon, who seemed to prove to somewhat higher standards of rigor thatOops! But of course they try to talk themselves out of it
“The value of Fox-and-Geese is 2 + 1/on”
Who was right? As often happens when good folks disagree, the answer is “both!” because it turns out that the parties are thinking of different things. The Winning Ways argument supposed an indefinitely long board, while Welton more reasonably considered the standard 8×8 checkerboard.Anyway, let us be happy that the matter is settled now and even more because they add an enormous amount of new material on the game to this second edition (in chapter 20; btw. if after yesterday you are still interested in the game of sprouts you might be interested in chapter 17 of the same volume). Most of the calculations were done with the combinatorial game suite program of Aaron Siegel.
Conway, geometry
No comments
Posted in games
Written on Sat, 14 February 2004 at 8:18 pm
Tags: Conway, geometry
If you liked this post, then consider subscribing to our full RSS feed.
Leave a Reply