Noncommutative geometry and the Riemann zeta function
Before we can even attempt to describe the adelic description of the Bost-Connes Hecke algebra and its symmetries, we’d probably better recall the construction and properties of adeles and ideles. Let’s start with the
p-adic numbers
and its field of fractions
. For p a prime number we can look at the finite rings
of all integer classes modulo
. If two numbers define the same element in
(meaning that their difference is a multiple of
), then they certainly define the same class in any
when
, so we have a sequence of ringmorphisms between finite rings

The ring of p-adic integers
can now be defined as the collection of all (infinite) sequences of elements
with
such that
for all natural numbers
. Addition and multiplication are defined componentswise and as all the maps
are ringmorphisms, this produces no compatibility problems.
One can put a topology on
making it into a compact ring. Here’s the trick : all components
are finite so they are compact if we equip these sets with the discrete topology (all subsets are opens). But then,
Tychonov’s product theorem asserts that the product-space
with the product topology is again a compact topological space. As
is a closed subset, it is compact too.
By construction, the ring
is a domain and hence has a field of fraction which we will denote by
. These rings give the p-local information of the rational numbers
. We will now ‘glue together’ these local data over all possible prime numbers
into adeles. So, forget the above infinite product used to define the p-adics, below we will work with another infinite product, one factor for each prime number.
The adeles
are the restricted product of the
over
for all prime numbers p. By ‘restricted’ we mean that elements of
are exactly those infinite vectors
such that all but finitely of the components
. Addition and multiplication are defined component-wise and the restriction condition is compatible with both adition and multiplication. So,
is the adele ring. Note that most people call this
the finite Adeles as we didn’t consider infinite places, i will distinguish between the two notions by writing adeles resp. Adeles for the finite resp. the full blown version. The adele ring
has as a subring the infinite product
. If you think of
as a version of
then
corresponds to
(and next time we will see that there is a lot more to this analogy).
The ideles are the group of invertible elements of the ring
, that is,
. That s, an element is an infinite vector
with all
and for all but finitely many primes we have that
.
As we will have to do explicit calculations with ideles and adeles we need to recall some facts about the structure of the unit groups
and
. If we denote
, then projecting it to the unit group of each of its components we get for each natural number n an exact sequence of groups
. In particular, we have that
as the group of units of the finite field
is cyclic of order p-1. But then, the induced exact sequence of finite abalian groups below splits
and as the unit group
we deduce that
where
is the specified unique subgroup of
of order p-1. All that remains is to determine the structure of
. If
, take
and let
denote the image of
, then one verifies that
is a cyclic generator of order
of
.
But then, if we denote the isomorphism
between the ADDITIVE group
and the MULTIPLICATIVE group
by the map
, then we have a compatible commutative diagram
![\xymatrix{\mathbb{Z}/p^n \mathbb{Z} \ar[r]^{\theta_{n+1}} \ar[d] & U_1/U_{n+1} \ar[d] \\
\mathbb{Z}/p^{n-1} \mathbb{Z} \ar[r]^{\theta_n} & U_1/U_n} \xymatrix{\mathbb{Z}/p^n \mathbb{Z} \ar[r]^{\theta_{n+1}} \ar[d] & U_1/U_{n+1} \ar[d] \\
\mathbb{Z}/p^{n-1} \mathbb{Z} \ar[r]^{\theta_n} & U_1/U_n}](/latexrender/pictures/a4271abebedd692c24e98a00ec3339d9.gif)
and as
this gives an isomorphism between the multiplicative group
and the additive group of
. In case
we have to start with an element
and repeat the above trick. Summarizing we have the following structural information about the unit group of p-adic integers

Because every unit in
can be written as
with
we deduce from this also the structure of the unit group of the p-adic field

Right, now let us start to make the connection with the apparently abstract ringtheoretical post from last time where we introduced semigroup crystalline graded rings without explaining why we wanted that level of generality.
Consider the semigroup
, that is all ideles
with all
with
and
with
for all but finitely many primes p. Then, we have an exact sequence of semigroups
where the map is defined (with above notation)
and exactness follows from the above structural results when we take
.
This gives a glimpse of where we are heading. Last time we identified the Bost-Connes Hecke algebra
as a bi-crystalline group graded algebra determined by a
-semigroup crystalline graded algebra over the group algebra
. Next, we will entend this construction starting from a
-semigroup crystalline graded algebra over the same group algebra. The upshot is that we will have a natural action by automorphisms of the group
on the Bost-Connes algebra. And… the group
is the Galois group of the cyclotomic field extension
!
But, in order to begin to understand this, we will need to brush up our rusty knowledge of algebraic number theory…
adeles, Artin, Connes, Galois, groups, ideles, modular, p-adic, topology, unit groups
3 comments
Posted in geometry
Written on Tue, 29 January 2008 at 10:08 am
Tags: adeles, Artin, Connes, Galois, groups, ideles, modular, p-adic, topology, unit groups
If you liked this post, then consider subscribing to our full RSS feed.
January 29th, 2008 at 10:21 am
[...] neverendingbooks placed an observative post today on adeles and ideles [...]
January 31st, 2008 at 3:48 pm
[...] spacethe Bost-Connes Hecke algebraBost-Connes for ringtheoristsBC stands for Bi-Crystalline gradedadeles and idelesChinese remainders and adele [...]
February 2nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
[...] the Bost-Connes Hecke algebra Bost-Connes for ringtheorists BC stands for Bi-Crystalline graded adeles and ideles Chinese remainders and adele classesabc on adelic [...]